top of page
Old City Jerusalem

           SUMMER COURSE

ALL SAINTS CHURCH HALL 7.30pm to 9.15pm Wednesday evenings this Summer

A CHRISTIAN RESPONSE TO THE SUBJECT OF….

16th July The Palestinian/ Israel situation

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Introductory Reading - future weeks will be published once the course has begun

 

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict presents a complex moral and theological landscape for Christians. As people of faith called to justice, peace, and reconciliation, Christians are compelled to engage with this conflict in a thoughtful and informed manner. This engagement necessitates asking critical questions that challenge assumptions, promote empathy, and encourage a nuanced understanding of the situation.

​

I. Theological Foundations and Ethical Imperatives:

Christians must first ground their engagement in the conflict within their theological framework. This involves asking:

  • What does the Bible teach about justice, peace, and reconciliation?

    • The Old Testament prophets consistently call for justice for the marginalized and oppressed.

    • Jesus's teachings emphasize love for enemies, forgiveness, and the pursuit of peace.

    • How do these principles apply to the Israeli-Palestinian context?

  • How does the concept of "the Promised Land" inform our understanding of the conflict?

    • Interpretations of the Promised Land vary among Christians, with some emphasizing its literal fulfillment and others emphasizing its symbolic or spiritual significance.

    • How do different interpretations impact our ethical obligations toward both Israelis and Palestinians?

    • Does the concept of a promised land give a people a perpetual right to land, and how does this affect the people already living there?

  • What is the relationship between Christianity and Judaism, and how does this impact our perspective on the conflict?

    • Christianity has its roots in Judaism, and a deep understanding of Jewish history and theology is essential.

    • How do we navigate the complex history of Christian-Jewish relations, including the legacy of antisemitism?

    • How does supersessionism, the theological view that Christianity replaced Judaism, affect the Christian view of modern day Israel?

  • How do we balance our support for Israel with our concern for Palestinian human rights?

    • Many Christians feel a strong sense of solidarity with Israel, particularly given the history of persecution faced by Jewish people.

    • However, this support must be balanced with a commitment to human rights and justice for all people, including Palestinians.

    • How do we ensure that our support for one side does not come at the expense of the other?

  • What does it mean to be a peacemaker in this context?

    • Jesus calls his followers to be peacemakers, but this can be challenging in a conflict marked by deep divisions and violence.

    • How can we promote dialogue, understanding, and reconciliation between Israelis and Palestinians?

    • What practical steps can Christians take to contribute to a just and lasting peace?

II. Historical and Political Realities:

Beyond theological considerations, Christians must engage with the historical and political realities of the conflict. This involves asking:

  • What is the historical context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

    • Understanding the history of the region, including the British Mandate, the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, the 1967 Six-Day War, and the Oslo Accords, is essential.

    • How have historical events shaped the current situation?

    • How does the concept of the Nakba, the Palestinian displacement of 1948, affect the current conflict?

  • What are the perspectives of both Israelis and Palestinians?

    • It is crucial to listen to and understand the narratives of both sides, even when they differ significantly.

    • What are the legitimate security concerns of Israelis?

    • What are the legitimate grievances of Palestinians?

    • How does the occupation affect the daily lives of Palestinians?

  • What is the role of international law and human rights in the conflict?

    • International law and human rights standards provide a framework for evaluating the actions of both sides.

    • How do we assess the legality and morality of Israeli settlements in the West Bank?

    • How do we address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza?

    • What are the legal rights of Palestinian refugees?

  • What are the root causes of the conflict?

    • The conflict is complex and multifaceted, with no single cause.

    • What are the political, economic, and social factors that contribute to the ongoing violence?

    • How does religious extremism on both sides fuel the conflict?

  • What are the obstacles to a just and lasting peace?

    • Identifying the obstacles to peace is essential for developing effective strategies for conflict resolution.

    • What are the roles of political leadership, public opinion, and external actors in hindering or promoting peace?

III. Ethical Considerations and Practical Actions:

Christians must also consider the ethical implications of their engagement with the conflict and identify practical actions they can take. This involves asking:

  • How can we promote empathy and understanding between Israelis and Palestinians?

    • Building bridges of understanding requires engaging with people from both sides of the conflict.

    • How can we create opportunities for dialogue and cross-cultural exchange?

    • How can we combat stereotypes and prejudice?

  • How can we support organizations working for peace and justice in the region?

    • Many organizations are working to promote peace, human rights, and humanitarian aid.

    • How can we provide financial and practical support to these organizations?

    • How can we ensure that our support is aligned with our values?

  • How can we advocate for policies that promote a just and lasting peace?

    • Christians can use their voices to advocate for policies that promote peace and justice.

    • How can we engage with our elected officials and other policymakers?

    • How can we raise awareness about the conflict within our communities?

  • How can we challenge our own biases and assumptions?

    • We all have biases and assumptions that can influence our perspectives.

    • How can we engage in self-reflection and critical thinking to challenge our own biases?

    • How can we seek out diverse perspectives and information?

  • How can we pray for peace and reconciliation?

    • Prayer is a powerful tool for seeking God's guidance and intervention in the world.

    • How can we pray for both Israelis and Palestinians, for their leaders, and for all those working for peace?

    • How can we pray for ourselves, that we may be instruments of peace?

  • How can we combat antisemitism and islamophobia?

    • The conflict often fuels hatred against both Jewish and Muslim communities.

    • How can we be active in combating these forms of prejudice?

    • How can we promote interfaith dialogue and understanding?

IV. Avoiding Pitfalls and Promoting Responsible Engagement:

  • Avoid simplistic narratives and binary thinking: The conflict is complex, and simplistic narratives often fail to capture its nuances.

  • Resist the temptation to demonize either side: Both Israelis and Palestinians are human beings with legitimate concerns and grievances.

  • Seek out diverse perspectives and information: Rely on credible sources from both sides of the conflict, as well as independent analysis.

  • Engage in respectful dialogue: Listen to and respect the perspectives of others, even when you disagree.

  • Prioritize human dignity and rights: All people, regardless of their ethnicity or religion, deserve to be treated with dignity and respect.

  • Promote reconciliation and forgiveness: Seek opportunities to build bridges of understanding and to foster reconciliation.

  • Acknowledge the suffering of both sides: The conflict has caused immense suffering for both Israelis and Palestinians.

  • Be critical of all sources: All sources of information should be evaluated for bias.

  • Understand that it is possible to criticize the actions of the Israeli government, without being antisemitic.

  • Understand that it is possible to criticize the actions of Hamas, without being islamophobic.

By asking these critical questions and engaging in thoughtful reflection, Christians can contribute to a more just and peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

​
READ BELOW FOR A BACKGROUND TO THE CONFLICT
​

The current conflict in Gaza and the West Bank is a culmination of a long and deeply entrenched struggle between Israel and Palestinian factions, primarily Hamas. Understanding the roots of this conflict requires examining a complex web of historical events, political dynamics, and social factors. Here's a breakdown of the key elements contributing to the ongoing tensions:

I. Historical Roots and Core Issues:

  • The 1948 Arab-Israeli War and the Nakba:

    • The establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 led to the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, known as the Nakba ("catastrophe").

    • This displacement created a deep sense of grievance and a persistent refugee problem, with many Palestinians and their descendants living in refugee camps, including those in Gaza.

    • The 1949 armistice left Gaza under Egyptian control.

  • The 1967 Six-Day War and Israeli Occupation:

    • Israel's victory in the 1967 Six-Day War resulted in its occupation of the Gaza Strip, along with the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and other territories.

    • The occupation led to decades of Israeli military control, restrictions on Palestinian movement, and the establishment of Israeli settlements.

    • This occupation fueled resentment and resistance among Palestinians.

  • The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict's Core Issues:

    • The conflict revolves around fundamental issues, including:

      • The status of Jerusalem, claimed by both Israelis and Palestinians as their capital.

      • The right of return for Palestinian refugees.

      • The establishment of a viable Palestinian state.

      • The security of Israel.

      • The existance and expansion of Israeli settlements.

      • The borders of a future Palestinian state.

II. The Rise of Hamas and the Gaza Blockade:

  • The Emergence of Hamas:

    • Hamas, a Palestinian Islamist organization, emerged in the late 1980s during the First Intifada.

    • It gained support by providing social services and advocating for armed resistance against Israel.

    • Hamas's ideology rejects the existence of Israel and calls for the establishment of an Islamic state in Palestine.

  • Hamas's Takeover of Gaza:

    • In 2005, Israel withdrew its troops and settlers from the Gaza Strip.

    • In 2006, Hamas won the Palestinian legislative elections.

    • In 2007, Hamas violently seized control of Gaza from the Palestinian Authority (Fatah).

  • The Israeli and Egyptian Blockade:

    • Following Hamas's takeover, Israel and Egypt imposed a blockade on Gaza, citing security concerns.

    • The blockade has severely restricted the movement of people and goods, leading to economic hardship and humanitarian crises.

    • The blockade is a major point of contention, with Palestinians arguing that it constitutes collective punishment.

  • Rocket Fire and Israeli Military Operations:

    • Hamas and other militant groups in Gaza have fired thousands of rockets into Israel.

    • Israel has responded with military operations, including airstrikes and ground incursions, aimed at stopping rocket fire and dismantling Hamas's infrastructure.

    • These military operations have caused significant casualties and damage in Gaza.

III. The Cycle of Violence and Failed Peace Efforts:

  • Recurring Conflicts:

    • The Gaza Strip has experienced multiple rounds of intense fighting between Israel and Hamas, resulting in significant loss of life and destruction.

    • These conflicts have failed to resolve the underlying issues, perpetuating a cycle of violence.

  • Failed Peace Negotiations:

    • Numerous attempts to broker a lasting peace agreement have failed.

    • Deep divisions between Israeli and Palestinian leadership, along with mistrust and violence, have hindered progress.

    • The divide between the Palestinian authority in the west bank, and Hamas in Gaza, has created an additional barrier to peace.

  • The Role of Extremism:

    • Extremist elements on both sides of the conflict have undermined peace efforts.

    • Hamas's rejection of Israel's existence and the actions of Israeli hardliners have created obstacles to compromise.

IV. Humanitarian Crisis and Social Factors:

  • The Humanitarian Situation in Gaza:

    • The Gaza Strip faces a severe humanitarian crisis, with high rates of poverty, unemployment, and food insecurity.

    • The blockade and recurring conflicts have damaged infrastructure and limited access to essential services.

    • The young population of Gaza has a high level of hopelessness.

  • Social and Psychological Impact:

    • The constant threat of violence and the harsh living conditions have had a profound psychological impact on the population of Gaza.

    • Trauma, anxiety, and despair are widespread, particularly among children.

    • The lack of hope for a peaceful resolution exacerbates these issues.

  • The Role of International Actors:

    • The international community has made many attempts to mediate the conflict, and provide humanitarian aid.

    • Differing opinions from world powers on the subject has made it very difficult to come to a lasting solution.

    • The UN has been very active in the region, but has limited power to enforce peace.

V. Immediate Causes of Recent Escalations:

  • Tensions in Jerusalem:

    • Recent escalations have often been triggered by tensions in Jerusalem, particularly around the Al-Aqsa Mosque and disputes over Palestinian evictions.

    • These events have served as flashpoints, igniting broader conflict.

  • Political Instability:

    • Political instability within both Israel and the Palestinian territories has contributed to the volatile situation.

    • Internal political struggles can lead to increased reliance on nationalist rhetoric and actions.

  • Rocket Attacks and Retaliation:

    • Rocket attacks from Gaza and Israeli retaliatory strikes are often the immediate triggers for escalations.

    • The cycle of violence is difficult to break, as each side perceives its actions as defensive.

  • The influence of social media:

    • Social media has played a large role in fueling the current conflict. It is used to spread propaganda, and incite violence.

The conflict in Gaza is a complex and deeply rooted problem with no easy solutions. Addressing the core issues, including the occupation, the blockade, and the status of Jerusalem, is essential for achieving a lasting peace.

​
THE EFFECT OF OCTOBER 7th ON THE SITUATION


​The conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, already deeply entrenched, escalated dramatically following the Hamas attacks on October 7th, 2023. This event and Israel's subsequent response have ignited a new phase of violence and suffering, further complicating the already intractable situation. Here's a breakdown of the conflict's progression since that date:

I. The Hamas Attacks of October 7th, 2023:

  • Unprecedented Infiltration:

    • Hamas launched a large-scale, coordinated attack, infiltrating southern Israel by land, sea, and air.

    • The attacks involved thousands of rockets, breaches of the Gaza security barrier, and armed incursions into Israeli communities.

  • Civilian Casualties and Abductions:

    • The attacks resulted in the deaths of over 1,200 Israelis, primarily civilians, including women, children, and the elderly.

    • Hamas also abducted hundreds of Israelis, taking them back to Gaza as hostages.

    • The attacks were marked by extreme brutality and violence.

  • Impact on Israeli Society:

    • The attacks caused widespread shock, trauma, and a sense of vulnerability within Israeli society.

    • It shattered the perception of security and led to a surge in national unity and a determination to respond forcefully.

    • It created a deep feeling of betrayal, and anger.

II. Israel's Response: Operation Iron Swords:

  • Declaration of War:

    • Israel declared a state of war and launched Operation Iron Swords, a large-scale military operation in the Gaza Strip.

  • Intense Aerial Bombardment:

    • Israel conducted extensive airstrikes targeting Hamas infrastructure, including rocket launch sites, tunnels, and command centers.

    • The bombardment caused widespread destruction and civilian casualties in Gaza.

  • Ground Incursion:

    • Israel launched a ground incursion into Gaza, aimed at dismantling Hamas's military capabilities and rescuing hostages.

    • The ground operation involved intense urban warfare, leading to further casualties and destruction.

  • Blockade and Humanitarian Crisis:

    • Israel tightened the blockade on Gaza, restricting the entry of essential supplies, including food, water, and medicine.

    • The blockade, combined with the destruction caused by the fighting, exacerbated the already dire humanitarian situation in Gaza.

    • The displacement of hundreds of thousands of Gazan citizens.

III. The Humanitarian Catastrophe in Gaza:

  • Massive Civilian Casualties:

    • The Israeli military operations have resulted in a very large number of Palestinian deaths, a significant percentage of whom are civilians, including children.

    • The scale of civilian casualties has drawn widespread international condemnation.

  • Destruction of Infrastructure:

    • The fighting has caused widespread destruction of homes, hospitals, schools, and other essential infrastructure in Gaza.

    • The destruction has left hundreds of thousands of Palestinians homeless and without access to basic services.

  • Collapse of Healthcare System:

    • The healthcare system in Gaza has been overwhelmed, with hospitals struggling to cope with the influx of wounded and the shortage of supplies.

    • The lack of access to medical care has exacerbated the suffering of the population.

  • Food and Water Shortages:

    • The blockade and the destruction of infrastructure have led to severe food and water shortages in Gaza.

    • The population is facing a growing risk of starvation and disease.

  • Displacement and Refugee Crisis:

    • Hundreds of thousands of Gazans have been displaced from their homes, seeking shelter in overcrowded UN facilities or with relatives.

    • This displacement has created a massive refugee crisis within the Gaza Strip.

IV. Regional and International Implications:

  • Increased Regional Tensions:

    • The conflict has heightened tensions throughout the Middle East, with concerns about a wider regional war.

    • Hezbollah in Lebanon and other militant groups have launched attacks on Israel, and there are fears of further escalation.

  • International Condemnation and Division:

    • The international community has been divided in its response to the conflict.

    • Many countries have condemned the Hamas attacks, while others have criticized Israel's military operations and called for a ceasefire.

    • There have been massive protests around the world.

  • Impact on Israeli-Arab Relations:

    • The conflict has strained Israel's relations with Arab states, even those that have recently normalized ties.

    • Public opinion in the Arab world has been strongly critical of Israel's actions.

  • Rise in Antisemitism and Islamophobia:

    • The conflict has led to a surge in antisemitic and Islamophobic incidents around the world.

    • This rise in hate speech and violence has further polarized communities.

V. The Future of the Conflict:

  • Uncertainty and Instability:

    • The conflict has created a highly volatile and unpredictable situation, with no clear end in sight.

    • The long-term consequences of the conflict are uncertain, but it is likely to further entrench the cycle of violence.

  • Challenges to Peace Efforts:

    • The conflict has dealt a severe blow to any remaining hopes for a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    • The deep divisions and mistrust between the two sides have been exacerbated, making future negotiations even more difficult.

  • The Need for Humanitarian Aid:

    • There is an urgent need for humanitarian aid to address the catastrophic situation in Gaza.

    • The international community must work to provide essential supplies and support to the affected population.

  • Long Term ramifications:

    • The long term ramifications of the hostages taken by Hamas, and the destruction of Gaza will be felt for generations.

    • The political landscape of Israel, and the Palestinian territories will be forever changed.

    • The world's view of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict has been altered.

The events since October 7th, 2023, have plunged the region into a new and devastating phase of conflict, leaving a trail of death, destruction, and despair. Understanding the complexities of this conflict is crucial for comprehending the ongoing suffering and for working towards a future where peace and security are possible for both Israelis and Palestinians.

​

UNDERSTANDING THE GROWTH OF THE RIGHT WING IN ISRAEL

​

 

The growth of the right wing in Israeli politics is a complex phenomenon with deep historical roots and multifaceted causes. It's a trend that has significantly shaped Israel's political landscape, particularly since the turn of the 21st century. This essay will explore the key factors contributing to this shift, using bullet points to highlight major points within the narrative.

I. Historical Context and Ideological Foundations:

  • Zionist Revisionism:

    • The ideological foundations of the right wing are rooted in Revisionist Zionism, a movement led by Ze'ev Jabotinsky.

    • Revisionism emphasized territorial expansion, a strong military, and a more assertive approach to dealing with Arab opposition.

    • This contrasted with the Labor Zionist movement's emphasis on socialist principles and a more conciliatory approach.

  • The Impact of the 1967 Six-Day War:

    • The war's outcome, with Israel's capture of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem, and other territories, significantly altered the political landscape.

    • It fueled a sense of national triumph and strengthened the belief in Israel's right to these territories, particularly among religious and nationalist groups.

    • The concept of "Greater Israel" gained traction, advocating for the annexation of these territories.

  • Religious Zionism:

    • Religious Zionism, which combines Jewish religious observance with Zionist ideology, played a crucial role in the right's growth.

    • The belief that the captured territories were biblically ordained strengthened the religious right's commitment to settlement construction.

    • Gush Emunim, a settlement movement, became a powerful force in promoting this ideology.

II. The Decline of the Labor Party and the Rise of Likud:

  • Erosion of Labor's Dominance:

    • The Labor Party, which had dominated Israeli politics for decades, began to decline in the late 20th century.

    • Factors contributing to this decline included the Yom Kippur War's perceived failures, economic challenges, and growing social divisions.

    • The rise of Likud, led by figures like Menachem Begin and later Benjamin Netanyahu, capitalized on Labor's decline.

  • Likud's Appeal:

    • Likud appealed to a broader base, including Sephardic Jews, who often felt marginalized by the Labor establishment.

    • The party's emphasis on national security and a tough stance against Palestinian militancy resonated with many Israelis.

    • Begin's peace treaty with Egypt, while historically significant, also created a political divide within the left, and boosted Likud's image.

  • The Intifadas and Security Concerns:

    • The First and Second Intifadas significantly impacted Israeli public opinion, strengthening the right wing's narrative of security threats.

    • The violence and suicide bombings fueled a sense of fear and distrust, leading many Israelis to support a more hawkish approach.

    • The failure of the Oslo accords to provide lasting peace also caused a shift to the right.

III. The Role of Settlement Expansion and Demographics:

  • Settlement Construction:

    • The expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank has been a key policy of right-wing governments.

    • Settlements are seen as a way to establish facts on the ground and strengthen Israel's control over the territories.

    • This policy has been a major point of contention in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

  • Demographic Changes:

    • The growth of the ultra-Orthodox population, which tends to vote for right-wing and religious parties, has also contributed to the right's strength.

    • The high birth rates in these communities have shifted the demographic balance in Israel.

    • The right wing has also successfully courted the Russian speaking immigrant population.

  • Changes within the Religious Zionist sector:

    • A shift to the right within the religious zionist community has also occured, with increased support for right wing political parties.

IV. Political Fragmentation and Coalition Dynamics:

  • Rise of Smaller Right-Wing Parties:

    • The Israeli political system's proportional representation has led to the proliferation of smaller parties, many of which are on the right.

    • These parties often hold significant influence in coalition governments, allowing them to push for their agendas.

    • The fragmentation of the right wing itself has created internal competition, sometimes leading to more extreme positions.

  • Coalition Politics:

    • Right-wing parties have been adept at forming coalition governments, often excluding left-wing and Arab parties.

    • This has allowed them to implement their policies, including settlement expansion and a tough stance on security.

    • The inability for the left wing to form stable coalitions has further weakened their position.

  • The Netanyahu Era:

    • Benjamin Netanyahu's long tenure as Prime Minister has been a significant factor in the right's dominance.

    • His political skills and ability to navigate coalition politics have kept him in power for extended periods.

    • Netanyahu's rhetoric and policies have further solidified the right wing's position.

V. Social and Cultural Factors:

  • Media Influence:

    • The rise of right-wing media outlets has contributed to the dissemination of right-wing ideology.

    • These outlets often portray a narrative that emphasizes security threats and criticizes the left.

    • Social media has also played a role in the spread of right-wing views.

  • Erosion of Trust in Peace Processes:

    • The perceived failure of peace negotiations has led to a decline in public trust in the peace process.

    • This has strengthened the right wing's argument that a lasting peace is not possible and that Israel must rely on its own strength.

    • The increase of terrorist attacks has also contributed to this erosion of trust.

  • Generational Shifts:

    • Younger generations of Israelis, having grown up in a climate of conflict and security concerns, are often more inclined to support right-wing policies.

    • The impact of educational systems, and military service, play a role in shaping these views.

  • The judicial reforms:

    • The recent judicial reforms that were proposed by the right wing coalition have caused massive protests, and shown a deep divide within Israeli society.16

The growth of the right wing in Israel is a complex and evolving phenomenon. It is driven by a confluence of historical, political, social, and cultural factors. Understanding these factors is crucial for comprehending the current state of Israeli politics and the challenges facing the region.

​

A  BACKGROUND UNDERSTANDING OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL IS HELPFUL

The history of the State of Israel is a complex and dynamic narrative, marked by ancient roots, modern aspirations, and persistent challenges. Here's a chronological overview, presented in bullet points, highlighting key events and developments:

I. Pre-Statehood and Zionist Beginnings:

  • Biblical Roots:

  • The region, historically known as Canaan, holds deep religious significance for Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

  • The Hebrew Bible narrates the story of the Israelites, their settlement, and the establishment of ancient kingdoms.

  • The Diaspora and Zionism:

  • Following the destruction of the Second Temple (70 CE), Jewish communities dispersed across the world (the Diaspora).

  • Zionism, a political movement advocating for a Jewish homeland, emerged in the late 19th century, driven by rising antisemitism in Europe.

  • Theodor Herzl's "Der Judenstaat" (The Jewish State) and the First Zionist Congress (1897) formalized Zionist goals.

  • The British Mandate (1920-1948):

  • Following World War I, the League of Nations granted Britain a mandate over Palestine.

  • The Balfour Declaration (1917) expressed British support for "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people."

  • Jewish immigration to Palestine increased, leading to growing tensions with the Arab population.

  • Arab revolts and Jewish self-defense organizations (like the Haganah) emerged.

  • The Peel Commission (1937) proposed a partition plan, but it was rejected.

  • The rise of Nazi power, and the following holocaust, caused a massive increase in Jewish immigration to Palestine.

  • Rising violence between Jewish and Arab populations, and also against the British Mandate.

II. The Establishment of the State of Israel (1948):

  • UN Partition Plan (1947):

  • The United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 181, proposing the partition of Palestine into separate Arab and Jewish states.

  • The Jewish leadership accepted the plan, but Arab leaders rejected it.

  • Declaration of Independence (May 14, 1948):

  • David Ben-Gurion declared the establishment of the State of Israel.

  • The 1948 Arab-Israeli War erupted immediately, with neighboring Arab states attacking Israel.

  • The war resulted in Israel expanding beyond the UN partition lines.

  • The war also caused the displacement of a large number of Palestinian Arabs, known as the Nakba.

  • Early Years of Statehood:

  • Mass immigration of Jewish refugees from Europe and Arab countries.

  • Development of state institutions, including the Knesset (parliament) and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

  • The Law of Return (1950) granted automatic citizenship to Jews.

  • The Suez Crisis of 1956.

III. Expansion and Conflict (1960s-1970s):

  • The Six-Day War (1967):

  • Israel launched a preemptive strike against Egypt, Syria, and Jordan, resulting in a decisive victory.

  • Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem, Sinai Peninsula, and Golan Heights.

  • The war significantly altered the geopolitical landscape and intensified the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

  • The Yom Kippur War (1973):

  • Egypt and Syria launched a surprise attack on Israel.

  • Israel eventually repelled the attack, but the war highlighted its vulnerability.

  • The war led to increased diplomatic efforts, including the Camp David Accords.

  • Camp David Accords (1978):

  • Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin signed a peace treaty.

  • Israel withdrew from the Sinai Peninsula.

  • The accords represented a major step towards regional stability.

IV. The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and Peace Efforts (1980s-1990s):

  • The First Intifada (1987-1993):

  • A Palestinian uprising against Israeli occupation erupted in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

  • The Intifada highlighted the growing frustration and desperation of the Palestinian population.

  • The Oslo Accords (1993):

  • Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) Chairman Yasser Arafat signed the Oslo Accords.

  • The accords aimed to establish a framework for a two-state solution.

  • The Palestinian Authority was established.

  • The Second Intifada (2000-2005):

  • A second Palestinian uprising erupted, marked by increased violence and suicide bombings.

  • The Intifada significantly damaged the peace process.

  • The death of Yasser Arafat, and the following rise of Hamas.

V. Contemporary Israel:

  • Gaza Withdrawal (2005):

  • Israel withdrew its troops and settlers from the Gaza Strip.

  • Hamas subsequently gained control of Gaza.

  • Conflicts with Hamas:

  • Israel has engaged in multiple military operations in Gaza to counter rocket attacks and other forms of violence.

  • The Abraham Accords (2020):

  • Israel normalized relations with the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco.

  • Political Polarization:

  • Israeli politics have become increasingly polarized, with divisions over the peace process, religious issues, and social policies.

  • Technological and Economic Development:

  • Israel has emerged as a global leader in technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship.

  • The Israeli economy has experienced significant growth.

  • Ongoing Challenges:

  • The Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains unresolved.

  • Security threats from regional actors persist.

  • Social and economic disparities continue to exist.

  • The current war with Hamas, that began on October 7th 2023.

This historical overview provides a framework for understanding the complex and evolving story of the State of Israel.

​

​

IT IS ALSO VERY IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THE BACKGROUND BEHIND THE GROWTH IN HAMAS AS A POLITICAL FORCE IN THE REGION

 

 

The Rise of Hamas: A Chronicle of Political Vacuum and Social Mobilization

Hamas's ascent to power in the Gaza Strip represents a complex interplay of political, social, and economic factors. While its ideology and actions remain deeply controversial, understanding its rise necessitates a comprehensive analysis of the circumstances that facilitated its growth.

I. The Erosion of Fatah's Dominance and the Creation of a Political Vacuum:

  • Disillusionment with the Palestinian Authority (PA):

    • Widespread perceptions of corruption and inefficiency within the PA, dominated by Fatah, eroded public trust.

    • The PA's failure to achieve tangible progress in peace negotiations with Israel led to widespread disillusionment and a sense of political stagnation.

    • The perceived collaboration of the PA with Israel in security matters alienated many Palestinians, who viewed it as a betrayal of the national struggle.

    • An aging and stagnant PA leadership, lacking new ideas and failing to connect with younger generations, created a desire for alternatives.

  • The Collapse of the Oslo Accords:

    • The failure of the Oslo Accords to deliver a viable Palestinian state fueled frustration and resentment, undermining the PA's credibility.

    • The continued expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank demonstrated the ineffectiveness of the peace process, further alienating Palestinians.

    • The violence of the Second Intifada, following the breakdown of the Camp David 2000 summit, solidified the perception that the Oslo framework was fundamentally flawed.

  • The Power Vacuum in Gaza:

    • The Israeli disengagement from Gaza in 2005 created a power vacuum that Hamas was well-positioned to fill, as Fatah struggled to maintain control.

    • Fatah's inability to effectively govern Gaza after the disengagement further weakened its position, allowing Hamas to consolidate its influence.

  • Internal Palestinian Divisions:

    • The deep and bitter rivalry between Fatah and Hamas weakened the Palestinian national movement, creating political instability.

    • Hamas exploited this division, capitalizing on the resulting chaos to gain support and consolidate its power.

II. Hamas's Social and Welfare Programs: Building a Grassroots Base:

  • Extensive Social Services Network:

    • Hamas established a comprehensive network of social services, including schools, clinics, and charitable organizations, providing essential support to impoverished Gazans.

    • These programs filled the void left by the PA's shortcomings, addressing the basic needs of the population and fostering a sense of loyalty.

    • The provision of these services built strong grassroots support, particularly among marginalized and impoverished communities.

  • Charitable Activities:

    • Hamas's charitable activities, funded by donations from various sources, provided much-needed aid to the needy, cultivating a perception of the organization as caring and compassionate.

    • During times of crisis, Hamas was often able to provide aid more quickly and effectively than the PA, enhancing its reputation.

  • Community Engagement:

    • Hamas actively engaged with local communities, addressing their concerns and providing assistance, fostering a sense of connection and belonging.

    • This engagement was particularly effective among marginalized populations, who felt neglected by the PA.

III. Hamas's Resistance Ideology and Militancy: Appealing to National Sentiments:

  • Rejection of the Oslo Process:

    • Hamas's staunch rejection of the Oslo Accords resonated with Palestinians who felt betrayed by the peace process, offering a more radical alternative.

    • Its commitment to armed resistance against Israel appealed to those who felt that diplomacy had failed, presenting Hamas as a defender of Palestinian rights.

  • Anti-Corruption Stance:

    • Hamas used an anti-corruption stance to gain support, painting the PA as corrupt and self-serving, appealing to public frustration with the existing order.

  • Nationalist Appeal:

    • Hamas's nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing the liberation of Palestine, struck a chord with many Palestinians, particularly those who felt that their national identity was under threat.

    • Its image as a defender of Palestinian rights and dignity bolstered its popularity, presenting itself as a true representative of the Palestinian cause.

  • Military Capabilities:

    • Hamas's military capabilities, including its rocket arsenal, gave it a sense of power and influence, enhancing its image as a resistance movement.

    • The Israeli military response to Hamas actions, often causing civilian casualties, inadvertently increased Hamas's popularity, portraying it as the defender of the Palestinian people.

  • Exploitation of Israeli Actions:

    • Hamas effectively exploited Israeli military actions and the blockade of Gaza to portray itself as the defender of the Palestinian people, capitalizing on public anger and resentment.

    • The suffering caused by these actions fueled resentment and strengthened support for Hamas.

IV. Political Strategy and Electoral Success: Consolidating Power:

  • Participation in Elections:

    • Hamas's decision to participate in the 2006 Palestinian legislative elections demonstrated its political ambition and proved a pivotal moment in its ascent.

    • Its victory in these elections, particularly in Gaza, reflected its growing popularity and the public's desire for change.

  • Strategic Alliances:

    • Hamas cultivated strategic alliances with regional actors, including Iran and Syria, providing crucial financial and military support, strengthening its position.

  • Control of Gaza:

    • The violent takeover of Gaza in 2007 solidified Hamas's control over the territory, allowing it to establish its own government and enforce its own laws.

    • This control, while achieved through force, provided Hamas with the means to consolidate its power and implement its agenda.

  • Effective Propaganda:

    • Hamas uses very effective propaganda, using social media, and other forms of media, to spread their message.

V. The Blockade and Humanitarian Crisis: Fueling Resentment:

  • Israeli and Egyptian Blockade:

    • The Israeli and Egyptian blockade of Gaza, imposed after Hamas's takeover, created severe economic hardship, fueling resentment and creating a fertile ground for Hamas's narrative.

  • Humanitarian Crisis:

    • The blockade led to a humanitarian crisis, with shortages of food, water, and medical supplies, further alienating the population from the PA and strengthening support for Hamas.

  • Economic Despair:

    • The lack of economic opportunities and the high unemployment rate in Gaza contributed to a sense of despair, making young people more susceptible to Hamas's recruitment efforts.

    • The isolation of the Gaza strip, has caused a feeling of desperation among the population.

VI. Religious and Ideological Factors: Strengthening Identity:

  • Islamic Identity:

    • Hamas's Islamic ideology resonated with many Gazans, particularly those who felt that their religious identity was under threat, offering a sense of purpose and belonging.

    • Its emphasis on Islamic values and principles provided a sense of community and solidarity.

  • Rejection of Secularism:

    • Hamas's rejection of secularism and its promotion of an Islamic state appealed to those who were disillusioned with the PA's secular approach.

  • Religious Education:

    • Hamas runs many religious schools, and other educational facilities, allowing them to indoctrinate young people.

  • Moral Authority:

    • Hamas tries to project an image of moral authority, and tries to paint the PA as immoral.

VII. External Support: Sustaining Power:

  • Iranian Support:

    • Iranian financial and military support has played a significant role in Hamas's rise, enabling it to build its military capabilities and maintain its control over Gaza.

  • Regional Alliances:

    • Hamas has cultivated alliances with other regional actors, including Hezbollah and other militant groups, providing strategic support and enhancing its regional influence.

  • Financial Networks:

    • Hamas has a large, and complex financial network, allowing them to gain funds from various sources.

In conclusion, Hamas's rise to power is a product of its ability to exploit the weaknesses of its rivals, provide essential services, cultivate a strong social base, and project an image of resistance against Israel. The combination of these factors, compounded by the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza and external support, has solidified Hamas's position as the dominant political force.

​

WHAT WOULD JESUS SAY?

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a complex tapestry of historical grievances, political strife, and human suffering, begs the question: What would Jesus, the Prince of Peace, say about this enduring struggle? While we cannot definitively claim to know his precise words, we can examine his teachings and actions, drawing upon biblical texts, to discern the principles he would likely apply to this deeply divisive situation.

I. The Foundation: Love and Compassion

  • Love Your Enemies (Matthew 5:44):

  • Jesus's radical call to love one's enemies stands as a cornerstone of his ethical teachings.

  • This principle challenges the natural human inclination towards retaliation and vengeance, urging instead a transformative love that seeks the well-being of all, even those perceived as adversaries.

  • In the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, this would necessitate a profound shift in perspective, moving beyond cycles of hatred and violence towards a genuine desire for reconciliation.

  • The Parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37):

  • This parable transcends ethnic and religious boundaries, illustrating that compassion should extend to all, regardless of their background.

  • The Samaritan, a figure despised by the Jews, demonstrates true neighborly love by caring for the injured traveler.

  • Jesus's message underscores the universality of human suffering and the imperative to respond with mercy and kindness, irrespective of national or religious affiliations.

  • Compassion for the Marginalized (Matthew 9:36):

  • Jesus consistently demonstrated compassion for the marginalized and oppressed, those on the fringes of society.

  • Both Israelis and Palestinians have experienced profound suffering and displacement, making them recipients of Jesus's empathetic gaze.

  • He would undoubtedly feel deep sorrow for the loss of life, the destruction of homes, and the enduring trauma inflicted upon both communities.

II. Justice and Righteousness

  • The Prophets' Call for Justice (Micah 6:8):

  • The Hebrew prophets passionately advocated for justice, particularly for the vulnerable and oppressed.

  • “He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.”

  • Jesus, as a faithful Jew, would have been deeply influenced by this prophetic tradition.

  • He would likely call for a just resolution to the conflict, addressing the root causes of inequality and oppression.

  • The Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:6):

  • “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled.”

  • Jesus's emphasis on righteousness highlights the importance of ethical conduct and moral integrity.

  • He would likely challenge both sides to examine their actions and to pursue a path of justice and fairness.

  • He would likely condemn any action that caused undue suffering to innocent civilians.

  • Challenging Hypocrisy (Matthew 23:27-28):

  • “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the6 outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean. In the same way, on the outside you appear to people as righteous but on the inside you are full of hypocrisy and wickedness.”

  • Jesus had no problem calling out hypocrisy. He would likely call out any double standards, or other forms of hypocrisy, that further fuel the conflict.

III. Peacemaking and Reconciliation

  • Blessed Are the Peacemakers (Matthew 5:9):

  • Jesus explicitly blessed those who strive for peace, recognizing their unique role in God's kingdom.

  • He would likely call for a cessation of hostilities and encourage both sides to engage in meaningful dialogue.

  • True peace, in Jesus's view, transcends the mere absence of conflict; it encompasses wholeness, healing, and restoration.

  • Forgiveness (Matthew 6:14-15):

  • Jesus's teachings on forgiveness are central to his message of reconciliation.

  • He would likely urge both Israelis and Palestinians to forgive past wrongs and to release the burdens of resentment and bitterness.

  • Forgiveness, however, does not negate the need for justice; it is a transformative act that opens the possibility for healing and restoration.

  • Seeking the Lost (Luke 15:4):

  • "Suppose one of you has a hundred sheep and loses one of them. Doesn’t he leave the ninety-nine in the open country and go after the lost sheep until he finds it?"

  • Jesus sought after the lost. He would seek after those who have lost hope, and those who feel lost in the conflict. He would seek to bring people together.

IV. Practical Implications

  • Condemnation of Violence Against Civilians: Jesus would undoubtedly condemn any violence targeting innocent civilians, regardless of their nationality or religion.

  • Emphasis on Humanitarian Aid: He would likely call for increased humanitarian aid to alleviate the suffering of those affected by the conflict, particularly in Gaza.

  • Encouragement of Interreligious Dialogue: Jesus would encourage dialogue and understanding between Jews, Muslims, and Christians, fostering mutual respect and cooperation.

  • Advocacy for a Just and Lasting Peace: He would likely advocate for a just and lasting peace, based on principles of equality, human rights, and self-determination.

In conclusion, while we cannot definitively know Jesus's precise words, his teachings on love, justice, and peacemaking provide a powerful framework for understanding how he might approach the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He would likely call for a radical transformation of hearts and minds, urging both sides to embrace a path of reconciliation and forgiveness.

​​

bottom of page